![]() |
General Trivia and History |
|
Pages: |
Miscellaneous
Trivia. Just because a site is run by a particular operator does not mean they have the lease. For example, at South Mimms, the "Head lease" is owned by BP, not Welcome Break. BP have supply arrangements with Welcome Break to provide the services. Other "Oil" owned sites are Anderton (M61), Killington Lake (M6) (both again by BP) and Burton West(M6), which was owned by Mobil, presumably now by BP. Originally, upon construction of a motorway, the Government would identify the sites for motorway services and these were then were leased to private operators, who agreed to certain conditions, for example 24 hour opening and provision of toilet facilities. Development was under tight control for many years as the belief of Government was that movement of traffic should be free from interruption. All successive governments have adhered to the policy that motorway services must be stop-off points, not destinations in their own rights. This is why the shops sell convenience items. This policy is backed up with a further policy that no more than 5,000 sq ft of a MSA can be for retail (excluding the fuel shop), and no more than 1,000 sq ft. for leisure. So next time you find the amusement centre is crowded, blame the government ;) The minimum distance between services was decreed as 25 miles (on the basis that this is about a half hours journey), with exceptions only where necessary (known as infill sites). In the 1970's the DOT acquired a few sites for potential development as "infill" sites, but only 2 were developed (Sandbach M6 and Rothersthorpe M1) In February 1992, the government deregulated the provision of motorways services. The minimum distance has now been changed to 15 miles- but only for locations where there is a clear need for such a short distance between services on safety grounds. Since then, 100's of applications have been submitted for new Motorway service areas, prompting many planning appeals, as local Planning Permission procedures and decisions affect whether or not a site can actually be built. The case for the development of a new Motorway service area is unusual in planning policy as applicants must demonstrate a need for the area in that location. If the need is not there then this counts as a negative point in consideration of the application.
Studies have shown that Offline Service Areas (those without direct access
to the motorway) have a lower turn off rate than others (on-line areas) The government has arranged for research into the effectiveness of Motorway service areas in reducing fatigue. Many MP's had letter
complaining about prices at Motorways Services, so the Office Of Fair Trading
investigated. In December 2000 they reported that complaints
about value for money were justified, but services operators were not operating
anti-competitively. England: Moto
Stafford (M6) - Northbound site
|